Benchmark: Checkbox checked

Checkbox checked (version: 1)

Various methods of getting the checked property of a checkbox, plus comparing the whether the checkbox is checked or not - expect no difference there but good to know if there is

Comparing performance of: Not checked - $.prop vs Checked - $.prop vs Not checked - $.is vs Checked - $.is vs Not checked - vanilla js property vs Checked - vanilla js property

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<input type="checkbox" value="x" name="test1" id="test1">
<input type="checkbox" value="y" name="test2" id="test2" checked>

Script Preparation code:

var x = $('#test1');
var y = $('#test2');

Tests:

Not checked - $.prop
x.prop('checked');
Checked - $.prop
y.prop('checked');
Not checked - $.is
x.is(':checked');
Checked - $.is
y.is(':checked');
Not checked - vanilla js property
x[0].checked;
Checked - vanilla js property
y[0].checked;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Not checked - $.prop
Checked - $.prop
Not checked - $.is
Checked - $.is
Not checked - vanilla js property
Checked - vanilla js property

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its various components.

**Benchmark Purpose**
The main goal of this benchmark is to compare different ways of checking if a checkbox is checked in JavaScript. The test cases aim to measure which approach is faster, more efficient, or both.

**Options Compared**

1. **$.prop('checked')**: This method is used by jQuery (a popular JavaScript library) to get the value of a property (in this case, `checked` for a checkbox). It's a convenient way to check if an element has a certain attribute.
2. **$.is(':checked')**: Another jQuery method that checks if an element matches a CSS selector (`:checked`). This method is useful when you need to perform additional actions based on the state of the checkbox.
3. **Element[0].checked**: This approach uses vanilla JavaScript (i.e., without any library) to access the `checked` property directly on the element.

**Pros and Cons**

* **$.prop('checked')**:
	+ Pros: Convenient, easy to use, and works well with jQuery.
	+ Cons: May incur overhead due to the library's functionality, and might be slower compared to native JavaScript methods.
* **$.is(':checked')**:
	+ Pros: Useful for more complex scenarios where you need to check an element against multiple conditions.
	+ Cons: May also incur some overhead due to the CSS selector complexity, which can impact performance.
* **Element[0].checked**:
	+ Pros: Native JavaScript, no library dependency, and often faster due to reduced overhead.
	+ Cons: Can be less intuitive for developers without experience with vanilla JavaScript.

**Library: jQuery**
jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. In this benchmark, it's used to provide the `$` symbol, which allows developers to access and manipulate HTML elements more easily. The `$.prop()` and `$.is()` methods are part of jQuery's API.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**
There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that using libraries like jQuery can introduce additional complexity and potential performance overhead due to the added functionality.

**Other Alternatives**

If you don't want to use a library like jQuery, you could consider alternative approaches:

* Using vanilla JavaScript only (`Element[0].checked` or `Element.checked`) for simplicity and potentially better performance.
* Leveraging other libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality (e.g., React's `useState` hook for state management).
* Writing custom code to achieve the desired behavior, which might be more efficient but requires more development effort.

In summary, this benchmark compares three approaches to checking if a checkbox is checked: jQuery methods (`$.prop()` and `$.is()`) versus native JavaScript using vanilla property access. The results will help developers understand the relative performance characteristics of these options.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2025 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.119 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 64 on Fedora

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Not checked - $.prop	4031073.5 Ops/sec
Checked - $.prop	4074724.8 Ops/sec
Not checked - $.is	939704.9 Ops/sec
Checked - $.is	914504.9 Ops/sec
Not checked - vanilla js property	10985625.0 Ops/sec
Checked - vanilla js property	10943726.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Checkbox checked (version: 1)

Various methods of getting the checked property of a checkbox, plus comparing the whether the checkbox is checked or not - expect no difference there but good to know if there is

Comparing performance of: Not checked - $.prop vs Checked - $.prop vs Not checked - $.is vs Checked - $.is vs Not checked - vanilla js property vs Checked - vanilla js property

Created: 6 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Not checked - $.prop

Checked - $.prop

Not checked - $.is

Checked - $.is

Not checked - vanilla js property

Checked - vanilla js property

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):