Benchmark: multiplication vs parseInt vs Number vs bitwise vs unary

Tests:

Unary
const num = +"10"
parseInt
const num = parseInt("10")
Number conversion
const num = Number("10")
double bitwise not
~~("10")
bitwise or
("10") | 0

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Unary
parseInt
Number conversion
double bitwise not
bitwise or

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created on MeasureThat.net. The test is designed to compare the performance of different approaches for converting strings to numbers in JavaScript.

In this test, five different approaches are compared:

1. **Unary**: Using the unary negation operator (`-`) to convert a string to an integer.
2. **parseInt**: Using the `parseInt()` function to convert a string to an integer.
3. **Number conversion**: Using the `Number()` constructor to convert a string to a number.
4. **Double bitwise not**: Using the double bitwise NOT operator (`~~`) to convert a string to an integer.
5. **Bitwise or**: Using the bitwise OR operator (`|`) with 0 to convert a string to an integer.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

Here's a brief overview of each approach:

1. **Unary**: This approach is simple and easy to implement, but it can be slow for large strings due to the overhead of negating the number.
2. **parseInt**: The `parseInt()` function is designed to convert strings to numbers and is relatively fast. However, it may not work as expected if the string does not contain a valid numeric prefix.
3. **Number conversion**: Using the `Number()` constructor is similar to `parseInt()`, but it can handle strings with decimal points more gracefully. However, it's still not perfect and may produce unexpected results for certain input strings.
4. **Double bitwise not**: This approach uses a double bitwise NOT operator (`~~`) to convert a string to an integer. While it's simple and easy to implement, it can be slow due to the overhead of bitwise operations.
5. **Bitwise or**: Using the bitwise OR operator with 0 is another way to convert a string to an integer. This approach is also relatively fast but can produce unexpected results if the input string contains non-numeric characters.

**Library usage**

None of these approaches use any external libraries, so there's no library-specific consideration here.

**Special JS features or syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The approaches rely solely on standard JavaScript operators and functions.

**Other alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative ways to convert strings to numbers in JavaScript, some other approaches include:

* Using a regular expression with the `RegExp.prototype.exec()` method
* Using the `BigInt` class (available in ECMAScript 2020+) to represent integers as binary fractions
* Using a third-party library like Moment.js or Luxon for date and number parsing

However, these alternatives are not specifically designed for converting strings to numbers and may have different performance characteristics compared to the approaches tested on MeasureThat.net.

In summary, this benchmark test provides a useful comparison of different approaches for converting strings to numbers in JavaScript. While some approaches may be faster or more efficient than others, understanding the trade-offs between each approach can help developers choose the best method for their specific use cases.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 110 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Unary	1040832896.0 Ops/sec
parseInt	14718068.0 Ops/sec
Number conversion	15912030.0 Ops/sec
double bitwise not	1043304320.0 Ops/sec
bitwise or	1041428928.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

multiplication vs parseInt vs Number vs bitwise vs unary (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Unary vs parseInt vs Number conversion vs double bitwise not vs bitwise or

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Unary

parseInt

Number conversion

double bitwise not

bitwise or

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):