var arr = [];
if (arr.length === 0) {
console.log(arr)
}
if (arr.length <= 0) {
console.log(arr)
}
if (arr.length) {
console.log(arr)
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
strong comparison | |
non strong comparison | |
length check |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
strong comparison | 479442.1 Ops/sec |
non strong comparison | 465100.6 Ops/sec |
length check | 21442408.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to test the performance of JavaScript engines in different scenarios when checking the length of an empty array. The benchmark consists of three individual test cases:
arr.length === 0
).arr.length <= 0
).arr.length
).Comparison Approaches
The benchmark compares three different approaches:
arr.length === 0
): This approach checks for strict equality, which can be more expensive due to the potential need for a comparison operation.arr.length <= 0
): This approach uses a less expensive comparison operation and is generally faster but may not detect all cases where the array is empty.arr.length
): This approach simply checks if the expression evaluates to a truthy value, which can be more efficient than explicit comparisons.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines may optimize or implement special features like Object.is()
for strict equality checks.
Other Alternatives
If you were to modify this benchmark, other alternatives could include:
Array
and has a length property (arr instanceof Array && arr.length === 0
).Uint8Array
, Int32Array
) to see how they handle empty lengths.Keep in mind that benchmarking is often about measuring performance under specific conditions. Feel free to modify or extend this benchmark to suit your needs!