Benchmark: map.set vs array.push

Tests:

map.set
const map = new Map(); for(let i=0; i<10000; i++) { map.set(i, i); }
array.push
const arr = []; for(let i=0; i<10000; i++) { arr.push(i); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
map.set
array.push

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
map.set	1632.0 Ops/sec
array.push	24542.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help you understand the test being performed on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark tests two JavaScript operations: `Map.set` and `array.push`. The goal of this benchmark is to measure which operation is faster when adding 10,000 elements to a data structure.

**Options compared**

There are only two options being compared:

1. `map.set`: This method sets the value associated with a key in a Map object.
2. `array.push`: This method adds one or more elements to the end of an array.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

**`map.set`**

Pros:

* Efficient use of memory, as it only allocates space for the key-value pairs being added.
* Fast lookups, as Maps have O(1) average time complexity for `set`, `get`, and `has` operations.

Cons:

* May incur additional overhead due to the creation of a new key-value pair, which can lead to slower performance compared to modifying an existing array.

**`array.push`**

Pros:

* Can reuse existing memory, as it modifies the original array.
* Fast append operation with O(1) average time complexity.

Cons:

* May require more memory allocation and deallocation, leading to slower performance.
* Slower lookups due to linear search in an unsorted array.

**Other considerations:**

Both options have a linear relationship between the size of the input data and the execution time. However, `map.set` may be faster for small inputs due to its faster lookup times and more efficient memory usage. For larger inputs, `array.push` might dominate due to its better cache locality and reuse of existing memory.

**Library used**

In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, the use of `Map` suggests that the benchmark is targeting modern JavaScript engines that support the Map data structure.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

The benchmark does not appear to rely on any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard methods and data structures (i.e., `Map`, arrays).

Related benchmarks:

map.set vs array.push (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: map.set vs array.push

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

map.set

array.push

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):