var array = new Array(100).fill(true)
array.slice()
array.filter(v => v)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Slice | |
Filter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Slice | 17880026.0 Ops/sec |
Filter | 3158600.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
What is tested?
The provided JSON benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: array.slice()
and array.filter()
. Both methods are used to create a new array with elements that pass a certain condition. In this case, the test creates an array of 100 elements filled with true
values.
Options compared
Two options are compared:
array.slice()
: This method creates a shallow copy of a portion of an array.array.filter()
: This method creates a new array with all elements that pass the provided testing function.Pros and Cons of each approach:
array.slice()
):array.filter()
):slice()
, as it uses a functional programming style.Other considerations:
true
values. In practice, the performance difference between slice()
and filter()
might be more pronounced with larger datasets or more complex filtering conditions.Library usage:
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, if we consider modern JavaScript features, the use of arrow functions (=>
) in the array.filter()
benchmark definition is a hint towards the ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) syntax.