Benchmark: replace vs substring vs slice from END

replace vs substring vs slice from END (version: 0)

Test the performance of replace() vs substring() vs slice() when replacing a char at the beginning of a (in this case uri query-)string that may or may not be there. Added the combined brackets[ ] + substr() method, since it's always the first char we wan't to pop off. Inspired by https://jsperf.com/replace-or-substr. Note: could not get 'let' and 'const' to work. Well, too bad...

Comparing performance of: substring vs replace inline regex vs replace compiled regex var vs slice

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Script Preparation code:

var strIn = 'https://www.data-xata.com/all-servers.html';
var strOut = '';
var regex = /\.html$/;

Tests:

substring
strOut = strIn.substring(0,strIn.length-5) + '.JS'
replace inline regex
strOut = strIn.replace(/\.html$/, '.JS');
replace compiled regex var
strOut = strIn.replace(regex, '.JS');
slice
strOut = strIn.slice(0,-5) + '.JS'

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
substring
replace inline regex
replace compiled regex var
slice

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests the performance of three different approaches for replacing characters in a string: `replace()`, `substring()`, and `slice()`. The test cases are designed to measure the speed of each approach when replacing a character at the beginning of a URI query string.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares four options:

1. `strOut = strIn.substring(0, strIn.length-5) + '.JS'`
2. `strOut = strIn.replace(/\\.html$/, '.JS')`
3. `strOut = strIn.replace(regex, '.JS')` (where `regex` is a compiled regular expression)
4. `strOut = strIn.slice(0,-5) + '.JS'`

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Substring()**: This approach creates a new string by taking a slice of the original string. It's simple and efficient, but it can create a temporary string object, which might incur additional memory allocations.
	* Pros: Fast and simple
	* Cons: Creates a temporary string object, might be slower due to memory allocation overhead
2. **Replace() with inline regex**: This approach uses a regular expression to replace the character at the beginning of the string. It's more flexible than `substring()` but can be slower due to the additional processing required for the regex.
	* Pros: Flexible and handles edge cases well
	* Cons: Can be slower due to regex processing, might not perform as well on very large strings
3. **Replace() with compiled regex**: This approach compiles a regular expression ahead of time, which can improve performance compared to inline regexes. However, it requires more memory allocation for the compiled pattern.
	* Pros: Faster than inline regex due to compilation, reduces memory allocation overhead
	* Cons: Requires more memory allocation, might not perform as well on very large strings with many edge cases
4. **Slice()**: This approach creates a new string by taking a slice of the original string. It's similar to `substring()` but uses a different implementation.
	* Pros: Fast and simple, avoids creating temporary string objects
	* Cons: Can be slower due to memory allocation overhead (similar to substring())

**Library Usage**

The benchmark uses the `regex` object to create compiled regular expressions. The `regex` object is a built-in JavaScript object that provides methods for working with regular expressions.

In the `replace()` tests, the `regex` variable is used as a pattern to match against. This allows the test to handle edge cases and replace characters in different ways.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark. The tests focus on comparing the performance of different string replacement approaches.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to create a similar benchmark, you might also consider testing other string replacement approaches, such as:

* Using `String.prototype.replace()` with a callback function
* Using `String.prototype.replace()` with a custom replacer function
* Using a library like Lodash or Ramda for string manipulation

Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can be significant, especially on very large strings. When choosing an approach, consider factors such as memory allocation overhead, caching, and the specific use case requirements.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 29 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 109 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
substring	2227654.0 Ops/sec
replace inline regex	2341121.0 Ops/sec
replace compiled regex var	1856950.4 Ops/sec
slice	3275349.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

replace vs substring vs slice from END (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: substring vs replace inline regex vs replace compiled regex var vs slice

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

substring

replace inline regex

replace compiled regex var

slice

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):