<div id="foo"></div>
var element = document.getElementById("foo");
var i = 1000;
while (i--) {
element.className = "bar" + i;
}
var element = document.getElementById("foo");
var i = 1000;
while (i--) {
element.setAttribute("class", "bar" + i);
}
var element = document.getElementById("foo");
var i = 1000;
while (i--) {
element.classList.add("bar" + i);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
className | |
setAttribute | |
classList |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
className | 1113.2 Ops/sec |
setAttribute | 950.4 Ops/sec |
classList | 0.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the details of the provided JavaScript microbenchmarks.
Benchmarking Context
The benchmarks test three approaches for dynamically modifying an HTML element's class list: using className
property, setAttribute("class" ...)
method, and classList.add()
method. These approaches are commonly used in web development to add or remove classes from an element.
Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the benchmarking code. However, it's essential to note that some browsers (like Chrome) may use internal libraries or APIs that can affect the results of the benchmarks.
JavaScript Features/Syntax
The benchmarks do not specifically target any special JavaScript features or syntax. They focus on testing the performance differences between three common approaches for updating an element's class list.
Options Compared
Here's a summary of the options compared in each benchmark:
className
property of the element.setAttribute()
method.classList.add()
method.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
element.className += 'bar' + i;
) in older browsers or with large class lists.classList
API.Other Considerations
When choosing an approach, consider factors like:
Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches to dynamically modifying an element's class list include:
style
property to add classes or using a library like jQuery.Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, trade-offs, and compatibility implications.