Benchmark: Javascript 'concat()' vs '+'

Script Preparation code:

var string1 = "Hello ";
var string2 = " world!";

Tests:

concat()
var message = string1.concat(string2);
plus_operator
var message = string1 + string2;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
concat()
plus_operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark tests the performance difference between two approaches to concatenate strings in JavaScript: `concat()` and the `+` operator.

**Options compared:**

There are only two options being compared:

1. **`concat()`**: A built-in method of JavaScript arrays that returns a new array by concatenating the elements of the original array with the specified arguments.
2. **`+` operator**: The standard way to concatenate strings in JavaScript using the `+` symbol.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **`concat()`**:
	+ Pros:
		- More readable and explicit code, as it's a method that performs concatenation.
		- Less prone to errors caused by unexpected string concatenation behavior (e.g., when using `+=`).
	+ Cons:
		- May incur additional overhead due to the creation of a new array object.
* **`+` operator**:
	+ Pros:
		- Faster and more efficient, as it's a native operation that doesn't create an intermediate object.
	+ Cons:
		- Less readable code, as the intent is not immediately clear from the simple `+` symbol.

In terms of performance, the `+` operator is generally faster because it's a native operation that can be optimized by the JavaScript engine. However, the difference may not be significant in most cases, and readability should always be considered when choosing between these two approaches.

**Library used:**

None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some browsers (like Opera) use various techniques to optimize string concatenation, such as reusing existing objects or using internal arrays for caching.

**Special JavaScript feature/syntax:**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison of two basic string concatenation methods.

**Other alternatives:**

For concatenating strings, other alternatives exist:

1. `str.join()`: An array method that returns a new string by concatenating all the elements of the original array.
2. `String.prototype.replace()` or `String.prototype.indexOf()`: Not typically used for simple string concatenation, as they're designed for more complex text manipulation tasks.

However, these alternatives are not part of the standard JavaScript language and may vary across browsers.

In conclusion, this benchmark tests two common approaches to string concatenation in JavaScript: `concat()` (using a built-in method) versus the `+` operator (a native operation). The choice between these methods depends on trade-offs between readability, performance, and potential overhead.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/107.0.0.0 (Edition Yx GX)

Browser/OS: Opera 107 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
concat()	13923676.0 Ops/sec
plus_operator	13825044.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Javascript 'concat()' vs '+' (version: 0)

Testing the performance difference between concat() and the + operator for strings in javascript

Comparing performance of: concat() vs plus_operator

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

concat()

plus_operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):