<p id="hello">hello</p>
function start() {
var doc = document;
var p = doc.getElementById('hello');
return p;
}
function start() {
var p = doc.getElementById('hello');
return p;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
cached document | |
direct document access |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
cached document | 69527080.0 Ops/sec |
direct document access | 70743768.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition and Script Preparation Code
The benchmark definition provides a basic JavaScript function that simulates accessing an HTML element with the ID "hello". The script preparation code is empty, which means no additional setup or initialization is required before running the test. However, since we have an HTML preparation code, it's clear that this benchmark tests how browsers handle caching for subsequent accesses to the same document.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared in this benchmark:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Cached Document:
Pros:
Cons:
Direct Document Access:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
In this benchmark, no specific library is used. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may use caching libraries or modules under the hood.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. It's a straightforward test of browser caching behavior.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring similar benchmarks, here are some alternatives:
chrome://benchmarks/
)about:benchmark
)Keep in mind that each website and tool has its own strengths and weaknesses, so it's essential to choose the one that best suits your needs.