var v1 = 12345678.12345;
var v2 = 23456789.01234;
var arr = [v2, v1]
var a = arr.sort();
var max = a[1];
var max = Math.max(v2, v1);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.sort | |
Math max |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.sort | 7241832.0 Ops/sec |
Math max | 5225537.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and explain what is being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach.
What is being tested?
The test compares two approaches to find the maximum value in an array:
Array.sort()
: This method sorts the array in ascending order and returns a new sorted array. The maximum value can be found by accessing the last element of the sorted array (arr[1]
).Math.max(v2, v1)
: This function takes two arguments and returns the largest of the two.Options compared
The test compares these two approaches:
Pros and cons of each approach
Library usage
In this benchmark, none of the libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, if we were to analyze the provided script preparation code, it includes the var
keyword and basic arithmetic operations (12345678.12345
, 23456789.01234
). These are part of the standard JavaScript language.
Special JS feature or syntax
There is no mention of special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark. It only uses built-in functions like Math.max()
and simple arithmetic operations.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to find the maximum value in an array, other approaches could include:
Array.prototype.reduce()
: This method reduces an array to a single value by applying a callback function to each element.Array.prototype.map()
: This method creates a new array with transformed elements. You could use it along with Math.max()
or another comparison function to find the maximum value.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to using built-in functions like Array.sort()
or Math.max()
.