Benchmark: Compare jQuery 3.6.1 vs. 3.2.1 Performance

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.1.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  var jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  var jq214 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div id="testElement"></div>

Tests:

jQuery 3.6.1
var element = jq331('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class');
jQuery 3.2.1
var element = jq214('#testElement'); element.removeClass('test-class'); element.addClass('test-class'); element.removeClass('test-class');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
jQuery 3.6.1
jQuery 3.2.1

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 131 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
jQuery 3.6.1	575930.6 Ops/sec
jQuery 3.2.1	658299.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its options.

**Benchmark Description**

MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares the performance of jQuery 3.6.1 and jQuery 3.2.1.

**What is tested?**

The test measures the execution time of two instances of jQuery: one using jQuery 3.6.1 (denoted as `jq331`) and another using jQuery 3.2.1 (denoted as `jq214`). The benchmark definition code snippet provided shows how to use these versions of jQuery in a simple JavaScript test case.

**Options compared**

The two options being compared are:

* **jQuery 3.6.1**: This version is more recent and likely has better performance, new features, and improved security.
* **jQuery 3.2.1**: This older version may have some compatibility issues with newer browsers or websites that rely on specific jQuery features.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

* **Using the latest version (jQuery 3.6.1)**:
	+ Pros: Better performance, new features, improved security.
	+ Cons: May break compatibility with older browsers or websites.
* **Using an older version (jQuery 3.2.1)**:
	+ Pros: Compatibility with older browsers and websites, potentially lower resource usage.
	+ Cons: Possibly slower performance, outdated security measures.

**Library and its purpose**

In this benchmark, jQuery is the library being tested. It's a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, and Ajax interactions. The `$.noConflict(true)` method is used to prevent conflicts between multiple versions of jQuery on the same page.

**Special JS feature or syntax (if applicable)**

None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.

**Other alternatives**

Other options for comparing JavaScript libraries or frameworks could include:

* Using a different library like React, Angular, or Vue.js
* Comparing performance with and without specific plugins or extensions
* Testing the impact of different optimization techniques on execution time
* Measuring the performance of code written in different programming languages (e.g., CoffeeScript, TypeScript)

Keep in mind that the choice of alternative options will depend on the specific use case and requirements of the benchmark.

Related benchmarks:

Compare jQuery 3.6.1 vs. 3.2.1 Performance (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: jQuery 3.6.1 vs jQuery 3.2.1

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

jQuery 3.6.1

jQuery 3.2.1

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):