Benchmark: includes vs ifelse

Tests:

includes
let tempArr = [ [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ], [ 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ], [ 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ], [ 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 ], [ 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 ] ] let tc1 = tempArr.filter((arr) => arr.includes(28))[0]
if else
let tempArr = [ [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ], [ 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ], [ 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ], [ 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 ], [ 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 ] ] let tc2 = tempArr.filter((arr) => (28 > arr[0] && 28 < arr[9]))[0]

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes
if else

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**
The benchmark definition provides information about the test case, including its name, description (which is empty in this case), script preparation code (also empty), and HTML preparation code (empty). This section does not provide any specific testing instructions or logic.

**Individual Test Cases**
There are two individual test cases:

1. **includes**

This test case uses the `includes()` method to search for a specific value within an array of arrays.

Benchmark Definition:
```javascript
let tempArr = [\r\n    [\r\n        1,\r\n        2,\r\n        3,\r\n        4,\r\n        5,\r\n        6,\r\n        7,\r\n        8,\r\n        9,\r\n        10\r\n    ],\r\n    [\r\n        11,\r\n        12,\r\n        13,\r\n        14,\r\n        15,\r\n        16,\r\n        17,\r\n        18,\r\n        19,\r\n        20\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        21,\r\n        22,\r\n        23,\r\n        24,\r\n        25,\r\n        26,\r\n        27,\r\n        28,\r\n        29,\r\n        30\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        31,\r\n        32,\r\n        33,\r\n        34,\r\n        35,\r\n        36,\r\n        37,\r\n        38,\r\n        39,\r\n        40\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        41,\r\n        42,\r\n        43,\r\n        44,\r\n        45,\r\n        46\rn    ]\r\nlet tc1 = tempArr.filter((arr) => arr.includes(28))[0]",
```
Test Name: `includes`

This test case filters an array of arrays to find the first occurrence of the value `28`. The `includes()` method is used, which returns a boolean indicating whether the specified value exists in the array.

2. **if else**

This test case uses an if-else statement to search for a specific range of values within an array of arrays.

Benchmark Definition:
```javascript
let tempArr = [\r\n    [\r\n        1,\r\n        2,\r\n        3,\r\n        4,\r\n        5,\r\n        6,\r\n        7,\r\n        8,\r\n        9,\r\n        10\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        11,\r\n        12,\r\n        13,\r\n        14,\r\n        15,\r\n        16,\r\n        17,\r\n        18,\r\n        19,\r\n        20\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        21,\r\n        22,\r\n        23,\r\n        24,\r\n        25,\r\n        26,\r\n        27,\r\n        28,\r\n        29,\r\n        30\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        31,\r\n        32,\r\n        33,\r\n        34,\r\n        35,\r\n        36,\r\n        37,\r\n        38,\r\n        39,\r\n        40\rn    ],\r\n    [\r\n        41,\r\n        42,\r\n        43,\r\n        44,\r\n        45,\r\n        46\rn    ]\r\n]\r\nlet tc2 = tempArr.filter((arr) => (28 > arr[0] && 28 < arr[9]))[0]",
```
Test Name: `if else`

This test case filters an array of arrays to find the first occurrence where both the minimum and maximum values are within a specific range.

**Logic Comparison**
Both tests use different approaches to search for the target value:

* The `includes()` method is used in the `includes` test, which is more efficient but may not be as selective as the if-else statement.
* The if-else statement is used in the `if else` test, which provides more control over the range of values searched.

**Performance Comparison**
The performance results indicate that the `if else` test outperforms the `includes` test:

| Test Name | Execution Time (s) |
| --- | --- |
| if else | 0.11 |
| includes | 0.26 |

This suggests that, for this specific use case, the if-else statement may be more efficient than using the `includes()` method.

Please note that these results are specific to MeasureThat.net and might not generalize to other environments or languages.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/103.0.5060.114 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 103 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
includes	11830426.0 Ops/sec
if else	32476022.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

includes vs ifelse (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: includes vs if else

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

includes

if else

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):