var test = (new Date().getTime() + '').substring(0,6);
var test = parseInt(new Date().getTime() / 10000000, 10);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
String | |
Int |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
String | 459381.0 Ops/sec |
Int | 424408.4 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases:
substring
and +
(string concatenation) operators.parseInt
with a radix of 10.Options compared
In each test case, two options are being compared:
substring
and +
operators to convert a string.+
operator alone without substring
.parseInt
with a radix of 10.parseInt
.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each option:
substring
+ +
):substring
, which can be slower than using only the +
operator.+
alone):substring
.parseInt
with radix 10):parseInt
.parseInt
):parseInt
.Library usage
In both test cases, no external libraries are being used. The substring
function is a built-in JavaScript method, while parseInt
is also a built-in function in modern browsers.
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being used in these benchmark test cases. However, it's worth noting that the use of +
operator alone (Option B) relies on the fact that the +
operator can be overloaded to perform different operations depending on its arguments. This is a common JavaScript feature, but not explicitly mentioned in this explanation.
Other alternatives
For similar benchmarking purposes, other alternatives could include:
Number()
function instead of parseInt
slice()
, substr()
, or regex-Oz
mode)Keep in mind that these alternatives would require modifications to the benchmark test cases and preparation code.