var errorLine, line, result;
line = errorLine = false;
result = line.errorLine === true ? 1 : 0;
result = +line.errorLine;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
using conditional | |
using int cast |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
using conditional | 4840496.0 Ops/sec |
using int cast | 4872349.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark is testing the performance of JavaScript in two different scenarios: using a conditional statement (line.errorLine === true ? 1 : 0
) and using an integer cast (+line.errorLine
). The goal is to measure which approach is faster.
Options compared
There are two options being compared:
result = line.errorLine === true ? 1 : 0;
result = +line.errorLine;
Pros and Cons
Both options have their advantages and disadvantages:
Using Conditional Statement
Pros:
Cons:
Using Integer Cast
Pros:
Cons:
line.errorLine
is not an integerLibrary
There is no library being used in this benchmark. The script preparation code only includes the variables errorLine
, line
, and result
.
Special JS feature or syntax
None mentioned, but it's worth noting that the use of the ternary operator (line.errorLine === true ? 1 : 0
) is a standard JavaScript feature.
Alternatives
If this benchmark were to be rewritten, alternative options could include:
line.errorLine
valueKeep in mind that the choice of option ultimately depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.