Benchmark: Math.pow(x,0.5) vs Math.sqrt(x) vs x**

Script Preparation code:

var numbers = Array.from(Array(10000), (_,x) => (Math.random()*x));

Tests:

Math.sqrt
numbers.forEach(x => Math.sqrt(x));
sqrt with Math.pow
numbers.forEach(x => Math.pow(x,0.5));
sqrt with **
numbers.forEach(x => x**0.5);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.sqrt
sqrt with Math.pow
sqrt with **

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The website is measuring the performance of three different ways to calculate the square root of a number:

1. `Math.pow(x, 0.5)`
2. `Math.sqrt(x)`
3. `x ** 0.5`

These operations are being performed on an array of 10,000 random numbers generated using JavaScript's Array.from() and Math.random() functions.

**Options Compared**

The three options are compared in terms of their performance (in executions per second). The benchmark is designed to measure which method is the fastest.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of each option:

1. `Math.pow(x, 0.5)`: This method uses the power operator (`**`) to raise `x` to the power of 0.5. While it may seem like an unusual way to calculate square roots, this method is actually quite efficient and widely supported in modern browsers.
2. `Math.sqrt(x)`: This is the traditional and most straightforward way to calculate square roots. It's a built-in function that returns the square root of a number.
3. `x ** 0.5`: This method uses the exponentiation operator (`**`) to raise `x` to the power of 0.5. While it may seem like a less conventional approach, this method is also efficient and widely supported in modern browsers.

All three options have their pros and cons:

* `Math.pow(x, 0.5)` is a good choice if you need to calculate square roots frequently and want to avoid the overhead of a built-in function.
* `Math.sqrt(x)` is a good choice if readability and simplicity are more important than performance.
* `x ** 0.5` is a good choice if you're already using exponentiation in your code and want to take advantage of its efficiency.

**Library**

None of the options explicitly use a library, but it's worth noting that some older browsers may not support these methods or might have different implementation details.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

The benchmark uses JavaScript's Array.from() function, which is a modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This function creates a new array from an iterable (in this case, `Array(10000)`).

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between these options, consider the following factors:

* Performance: If you need to calculate square roots frequently, `Math.pow(x, 0.5)` or `x ** 0.5` might be a better choice.
* Readability: If readability is more important than performance, use `Math.sqrt(x)`.
* Browser support: All three options are widely supported in modern browsers, but older browsers may have different implementation details.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative ways to calculate square roots, here are a few options:

1. Use the Babylonian method for calculating square roots, which is an ancient algorithm that's still efficient today.
2. Use a library like MathJS or Math-Tron that provides optimized implementations of mathematical functions, including square root calculations.
3. Use a programming language that supports arbitrary-precision arithmetic, such as Python or Java.

In summary, the benchmark is designed to measure the performance of three different ways to calculate square roots in JavaScript. The choice of method depends on factors like performance, readability, and browser support.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 21 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 115 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Math.sqrt	744.8 Ops/sec
sqrt with Math.pow	691.1 Ops/sec
sqrt with **	844.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Math.pow(x,0.5) vs Math.sqrt(x) vs x** (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Math.sqrt vs sqrt with Math.pow vs sqrt with **

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Math.sqrt

sqrt with Math.pow

sqrt with **

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):