Benchmark: Demo benchmark as guest user

HTML Preparation code:

<div>yo</div>

Script Preparation code:

console.log('yo');

Tests:

testcase #1
var t = 0 + 0;
testcase #2
var t = 0 - 0;
testcase #3
var t = 0;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
testcase #1
testcase #2
testcase #3

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 48 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
testcase #1	1023847296.0 Ops/sec
testcase #2	1023566272.0 Ops/sec
testcase #3	1027298496.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmarking test cases.

**Benchmark Definition and Preparation**

The `benchmark definition` is the actual code that will be executed to measure performance. It consists of three simple arithmetic expressions:

1. `0 + 0`
2. `0 - 0`
3. `0`

These expressions are used to test basic arithmetic operations in JavaScript. The `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code` sections are empty, which means that no specific setup or initialization is required for these tests.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the execution time of three different versions of a simple arithmetic expression:

1. `0 + 0`
2. `0 - 0`
3. `0`

Each test case measures how long it takes to execute one of these expressions, which provides insight into the performance characteristics of the JavaScript engine being tested.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

The use of simple arithmetic expressions like this has pros and cons:

Pros:

* Simple and easy to understand
* Provides a baseline for comparison
* Focuses on the execution time of basic arithmetic operations

Cons:

* May not accurately represent real-world scenarios or complex code
* Limited information about performance characteristics (e.g., no indication of branch prediction, cache misses, etc.)

**Library Usage**

There is no explicit library used in this benchmark. The `benchmark` framework might be implied by the use of JavaScript and its standard library functions, but it's not explicitly mentioned.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

None of the expressions used in this benchmark employ any special JavaScript features or syntax, as they are all basic arithmetic operations that do not rely on advanced language constructs.

**Alternative Benchmarks**

Some possible alternatives for similar benchmarks could include:

* Testing more complex mathematical functions (e.g., exponential, trigonometric)
* Incorporating loops or conditional statements
* Measuring performance in the presence of specific browser features (e.g., Web Workers, WebAssembly)

However, these alternatives would require more significant changes to the benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Result Interpretation**

The provided `Latest Benchmark Result` section shows three test cases with their corresponding execution times. The results indicate that:

* `testcase #3` (0) has the highest execution time
* `testcase #2` (-0) has a lower execution time than `testcase #1` (+0)
* All tests have similar execution times, but with some variation between different devices and browsers.

Keep in mind that this interpretation is simplified, as there might be other factors at play, such as branch prediction or cache misses, which are not accounted for by this benchmark.

Related benchmarks:

Demo benchmark as guest user (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: testcase #1 vs testcase #2 vs testcase #3

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

testcase #1

testcase #2

testcase #3

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):