var testArray = 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'.split('');
var delim = {'a': 1};
function spreadArrayErtema(array, delim) {
return array.reduce(function (result, item, i) {
return i === 0 ? result.concat(item) : result.concat(delim, item);
}, []);
}
function spreadArrayKbakba(arr, delim) {
var result = []
for (var i = arr.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
result.unshift(arr[i], delim);
};
result.pop();
return result;
}
spreadArrayErtema(testArray, delim);
spreadArrayKbakba(testArray, delim);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
ertema version | |
kbakba version |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
ertema version | 88116.3 Ops/sec |
kbakba version | 677392.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests two different implementations of the spreadArray
function: spreadArrayErtema
and spreadArrayKbakba
. The benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between these two functions.
Here's what's being tested:
spreadArray
function takes an array and a delimiter as input, and returns a new array with the original elements spread out using the delimiter.spreadArrayErtema
and spreadArrayKbakba
. These functions have slightly different logic for achieving the same result.Options Compared
The two options being compared in this benchmark are:
spreadArrayErtema
: This implementation uses the reduce()
method to concatenate elements with the delimiter.spreadArrayKbakba
: This implementation uses a simple loop to unshift elements with the delimiter.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
spreadArrayErtema
: This approach uses reduce()
, which is a built-in method that can be slower than a simple loop due to its overhead.spreadArrayKbakba
: This approach uses a simple loop to unshift elements with the delimiter.reduce()
, easier to understand for some developers.Library and Special JS Features
There is no specific library used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the reduce()
method is a built-in method in JavaScript, so no additional libraries are required to use it.
As for special JS features, there doesn't appear to be any explicit use of advanced features like ES6 syntax or WebAssembly.
Other Alternatives
If you were to implement your own spread array function from scratch without using the Array.prototype.concat()
method, you could consider the following alternatives:
Here's a basic example of how you might implement a simple spread array function using a custom loop:
function mySpreadArray(arr, delim) {
const result = [];
for (const item of arr) {
if (result.length === 0) {
result.push(item);
} else {
result.push(delim, item);
}
}
return result;
}
Keep in mind that this implementation is not as concise or efficient as the built-in Array.prototype.concat()
method, but it can be a useful learning exercise to understand how spread arrays work.