typeof B === 'undefined' || typeof C === 'undefined'
[typeof B, typeof C].every(function(elem) { return elem === 'undefined' });
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
typeof test | |
array group test |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
typeof test | 2407778.0 Ops/sec |
array group test | 1050270.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is testing two different approaches to check if variables B
and C
are undefined:
typeof B === 'undefined' || typeof C === 'undefined'
[typeof B, typeof C].every(function(elem) { return elem === 'undefined'; })
Options being compared
The two options are comparing the performance of checking if variables are undefined using a simple typeof
check versus an array-based check.
Pros and Cons
typeof
check: This approach is concise and easy to read, but it may not be as efficient as other methods. It relies on the fact that undefined
is a primitive value in JavaScript.typeof B
and typeof C
, and then uses the every()
method to check if all elements are equal to 'undefined'
. This approach can be more efficient for larger arrays, but it may be less readable due to its use of a functional programming style.Other considerations
array group test
uses the latest JavaScript features, including template literals and the every()
method.Library used
There is no library being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may have built-in optimizations for certain types of checks (e.g., typeof
) or may use libraries like V8 (used by Chrome) to execute JavaScript code.
Special JS features
The array group test
uses a few special JavaScript features:
[...].every(function(elem) { ... })
)every()
method=> ...
)These features are relatively modern and may not be supported in older browsers or environments.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to this benchmark, here are a few options:
!!B !== !!C
)in
operator instead of typeof
Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant to the specific use case being benchmarked, and the results may vary depending on the environment and browser being used.