var a = {a: 1}
var b = {a, b: 2}
var c = Object.assign({}, a, {b: 2})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
object spread | |
Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
object spread | 42775248.0 Ops/sec |
Object.assign | 12861979.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches for creating objects in JavaScript:
...
): This syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as part of the object literal notation.Test Cases
There are two test cases:
**: The benchmark code uses the object spread syntax to create a new object
bthat inherits the properties of
a, and then adds a new property
b: 2`.var b = {...a, b: 2}
Object.assign()
method to create a new object c
by copying properties from a
and adding a new property b: 2
.var c = Object.assign({}, a, {b: 2})
Comparison
The benchmark is testing the performance difference between these two approaches.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Object Spread (...
)
Pros:
Object.create()
.Cons:
Object.assign()
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, there is no library being used. The Object.assign()
method is a built-in JavaScript function that is part of the ECMAScript standard.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
Alternative approaches to object creation include:
Object.create()
method to create an object with a given prototype.{}
literal notation and manually setting properties on the resulting object.cloneDeep
function to clone objects.However, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark.