Benchmark: asdfq324fqwf23fasdf

Tests:

1
Math.random().toString().substring(2, 8)
2
Math.random().toFixed(6).substring(2)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark data.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The provided benchmark definition is a simple object that contains metadata about the benchmark:
```json
{
  "Name": "asdfq324fqwf23fasdf",
  "Description": null,
  "Script Preparation Code": null,
  "Html Preparation Code": null
}
```
This metadata includes:

* `Name`: A unique identifier for the benchmark.
* `Description`: An optional description of the benchmark, which is empty in this case.
* `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`: These are optional scripts that can be executed before running the benchmark. They are not used in this benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark consists of two individual test cases:
```json
[
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "Math.random().toString().substring(2, 8)",
    "Test Name": "1"
  },
  {
    "Benchmark Definition": "Math.random().toFixed(6).substring(2)",
    "Test Name": "2"
  }
]
```
Each test case has a unique `Test Name`. The `Benchmark Definition` property specifies the JavaScript code to be executed during the benchmark.

**Test Cases Explanation**

1. `Math.random().toString().substring(2, 8)`: This test case measures the execution time of generating a random number using `Math.random()`, converting it to a string using `toString()`, and extracting 6 characters from the beginning using `substring(2, 8)`.
2. `Math.random().toFixed(6).substring(2)`: This test case is similar to the previous one, but uses `toFixed(6)` instead of `toString()` to format the random number as a fixed-point number with 6 decimal places.

**Library Used**

There are no libraries explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's likely that the benchmark is using the built-in `Math` library for mathematical operations.

**Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax**

The benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, promise handling, or ES6+ syntax.

**Benchmark Result**

The latest benchmark result shows the performance data for both test cases:
```json
[
  {
    "RawUAString": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36",
    "Browser": "Chrome 97",
    "DevicePlatform": "Desktop",
    "OperatingSystem": "Windows",
    "ExecutionsPerSecond": 4401213.5,
    "TestName": "2"
  },
  {
    "RawUAString": "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36",
    "Browser": "Chrome 97",
    "DevicePlatform": "Desktop",
    "OperatingSystem": "Windows",
    "ExecutionsPerSecond": 3571521.75,
    "TestName": "1"
  }
]
```
The result shows the performance data for both test cases, including:

* `RawUAString`: The User Agent string of the browser running the benchmark.
* `Browser`, `DevicePlatform`, and `OperatingSystem`: Information about the browser and its environment.
* `ExecutionsPerSecond`: The number of executions performed per second during the benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative benchmarks or testing frameworks, here are a few options:

1. **Benchmarking libraries**: There are several JavaScript benchmarking libraries available, such as Benchmark.js, js-benchmark, and micro-benchmark.
2. **Online benchmarking platforms**: Platforms like CodePen, JSFiddle, and Repl.it offer built-in benchmarking tools for testing JavaScript code.
3. **Browser-specific benchmarking tools**: Some browsers, like Chrome DevTools, have built-in benchmarking tools for testing web applications.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different strengths and weaknesses compared to the specific implementation used in this benchmark.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 97 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
1	3571521.8 Ops/sec
2	4401213.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

asdfq324fqwf23fasdf (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):