Benchmark: Javascript slice vs substring

Script Preparation code:

var text = '$test';

Tests:

Substring
text = text.substring(1, text.length);
Slice
text = text.slice(1, text.length);
Substr
text = text.substr(1, text.length);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Substring
Slice
Substr

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 13 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 115 on Mac OS X 10.14

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Substring	30537140.0 Ops/sec
Slice	34983784.0 Ops/sec
Substr	35030824.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON defines two benchmark tests: `Javascript slice vs substring`. The goal is to compare the performance of three different methods for extracting substrings from a string in JavaScript:

1. `Substring` (using `substring()` method)
2. `Slice` (using `slice()` method)
3. `Substr` (using `substr()` method)

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the execution time of each method on a test string. The options being compared are:

* `substring()`: extracts a substring starting from index 1 to the end of the string.
* `slice()`: extracts a slice of the string starting from index 1 to the end of the string.
* `substr()`: extracts a substring starting from index 1 to the length of the string.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each method:

* **Substring`**:
	+ Pros: widely supported, simple to use.
	+ Cons: may be slower than other methods due to its iterative approach.
* **Slice`**:
	+ Pros: efficient, uses `length` property for bounds, which can lead to better performance.
	+ Cons: less widely supported than `substring()`, may not work in older browsers.
* **Substr`**:
	+ Pros: short and sweet, easy to read, but less efficient than other methods.

**Library and Purpose**

In the provided test case, none of the methods use a library. However, it's worth noting that all three methods are part of the standard JavaScript API.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

The benchmark uses special JavaScript feature/syntax:

* The `slice()` method was introduced in ECMAScript 5 (ES5), released in 2009.
* The `substr()` method is an older, deprecated method that has been replaced by `substring()`.
* The use of `$test` as a variable name in the script preparation code is likely just a placeholder or a convention used by MeasureThat.net.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative methods to extract substrings from a string, here are a few options:

* Use regular expressions: `text.match(/a-z/g)` would extract all lowercase letters from the string.
* Use `split()` and `join()`: `text.split('a').join('')` would remove all occurrences of 'a' from the string.
* Use a custom implementation using `for` loop or `Array.prototype.forEach()`

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the methods tested in this benchmark.

Related benchmarks:

Javascript slice vs substring (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Substring vs Slice vs Substr

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Substring

Slice

Substr

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):