Benchmark: Lev Myndra - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

~~(123123123.2387512395826564365346564356)

Tests:

~~
~~(123123123.2387512395826564365346564356)
num | 0
123123123.2387512395826564365346564356 | 0

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
~~
num \| 0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/93.0.4577.82 YaBrowser/21.9.1.600 (beta) Yowser/2.5 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Yandex Browser 21 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
~~	631548864.0 Ops/sec
num \| 0	619340864.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll explain the provided benchmark definition, options compared, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is created using MeasureThat.net's JSON format. The benchmark consists of two parts:

1. **Script Preparation Code**: This section contains the code that prepares the script for execution. In this case, it's a comment (`~~`) followed by a numerical value (`123123123.2387512395826564365346564356`). The comment is likely used to prevent browsers from caching or optimizing the JavaScript code.
2. **Html Preparation Code**: This section is empty (`null`), which means no HTML preparation code is required.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Test Case 1: `~~"`**
This test case measures the execution time of a single comment in the script.
	* Library used: None (only JavaScript)
	* Special JS feature or syntax: Not applicable
	* Purpose: This test case checks how browsers handle comments in scripts.
2. **Test Case 2: `num | 0`**
This test case measures the execution time of a numerical value followed by a pipe (`|`) and then `0`.
	* Library used: None (only JavaScript)
	* Special JS feature or syntax: Not applicable
	* Purpose: This test case checks how browsers handle numeric literals with a `| 0` suffix.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares two options:

1. **Comment-only script**: The first test case (`~~`) uses only the comment as part of the script.
2. **Numerical value with pipe and zero**: The second test case (`num | 0`) uses a numerical value followed by a `|` and then `0`.

**Pros and Cons**

* **Comment-only script**:
	+ Pros: Simple, easy to optimize for comments
	+ Cons: May not accurately reflect real-world script execution scenarios
* **Numerical value with pipe and zero**:
	+ Pros: Can provide insights into how browsers handle numerical literals with a `|` suffix
	+ Cons: May be more complex to optimize than comment-only scripts

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark uses MeasureThat.net's default JavaScript engine, which is the V8 engine used by Google Chrome.
* The benchmark is executed on a Linux desktop device using Yandex Browser 21 and YaBrowser/21.9.1.600 (beta) versions.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative benchmarks or tools to test similar scenarios, consider:

* Node.js Benchmarks: Measures the performance of Node.js applications.
* Benchmarking frameworks like benchmark-js, benchmark-queue, or jsbench.
* Browser-specific benchmarking tools, such as Chrome DevTools' Profiler or Firefox's Performance Tool.

Related benchmarks:

Lev Myndra (version: 0)

wdwdw dwd wdw

Comparing performance of: ~~ vs num | 0

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

~~

num | 0

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):