<div id="block1"></div>
<div id="block2"></div>
var block1 = document.getElementById("block1");
var block2 = document.getElementById("block2");
block1.append(block2);
block1.appendChild(block2);
block1.insertBefore(block2, null);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Append | |
AppendChild | |
insertAfter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Append | 1061840.5 Ops/sec |
AppendChild | 1241558.9 Ops/sec |
insertAfter | 1167521.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which consists of three parts:
block1
and block2
) from the DOM.<div>
elements with IDs block1
and block2
.Options Compared
The benchmark compares three different approaches to inserting a child element into another element:
.append()
method: This method appends an element to the end of its parent..appendChild()
method: Similar to .append()
, but it's a more explicit and efficient way to insert a child element..insertBefore()
method with null
as the second argument: This method inserts an element before the first child of its parent, effectively replacing the first child.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of each approach:
.append()
method:.appendChild()
method:.append()
, widely supported..insertBefore()
method with null
as the second argument:Library and Purpose
None of the benchmark test cases rely on any specific JavaScript library. The tests are designed to measure the performance of built-in DOM manipulation methods.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in these benchmark test cases. They only utilize standard JavaScript DOM manipulation methods.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for inserting child elements, here are a few more options:
DOMParser
to create a new DOM element from an HTML string.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional dependencies, complexity, or performance overhead compared to the built-in DOM methods used in this benchmark.