x = Math.pow(71,3)
y = 71 ** 3
z = 71 * 71 * 71
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Math.pow | |
exponentiation | |
Explicit multiply |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Math.pow | 489035808.0 Ops/sec |
exponentiation | 515511424.0 Ops/sec |
Explicit multiply | 503705472.0 Ops/sec |
The provided benchmark tests three different ways to calculate the result of 71^3
in JavaScript:
**
): This is the built-in operator in JavaScript for exponentiation. It's used as y = 71 ** 3
.Pros: Fast and efficient, directly implemented in the JavaScript engine. Cons: May not be optimized for all browsers or devices.
* * *
): In this approach, we calculate the result by multiplying 71
with itself three times: z = 71 * 71 * 71
.Pros: More readable and maintainable code, allows for easier debugging. Cons: Slower than exponentiation due to repeated multiplication.
Math.pow()
function: The Math.pow()
function takes two arguments: the base and the exponent. It returns the value of the expression base ^ exponent
. In this benchmark, it's used as x = Math.pow(71, 3)
.Pros: General-purpose function for calculating any power, can handle fractional exponents. Cons: May be slower than exponentiation due to additional overhead.
The choice of approach depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. If speed is critical and readability is not a concern, using the built-in exponentiation operator (**
) or Math.pow()
function may be the best choice. However, if code readability and maintainability are important, using explicit multiplication with three multiplies (* * *
) might be a better option.
It's worth noting that the benchmark results show Chrome 93 on Chrome OS 14092.77.0 executing each test case at different speeds, which indicates potential browser or device-specific performance variations.