var arr = Array(1000);
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
arr[i];
}
arr.forEach(it => {
it;
});
for (let it of arr) {
it;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
forloop | |
forEach | |
for...of |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
forloop | 14728.8 Ops/sec |
forEach | 481663.1 Ops/sec |
for...of | 1380820.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and results.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches to iterate over an array:
for
loop with an index variable (i
) that increments on each iteration.forEach
method, which iterates over an array using a callback function.for...of
loop syntax, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), which allows iterating over arrays without an index variable.Options Compared
The three options are compared in terms of their execution time. The benchmark is designed to test the performance of each approach on a large array of 1000 elements.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
Library and Purpose
None of the benchmark cases use any external libraries or frameworks. The arrays are created directly in the JavaScript code using Array(1000)
.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark uses the new for...of
loop syntax, which is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This syntax allows iterating over arrays without the need for an index variable, making it more concise and expressive.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other iteration methods, here are some alternatives:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, readability trade-offs, or use cases compared to the three options being benchmarked.