var obj = {
'a': 1,
'b': 1,
'c': 1,
'd': 1,
'e': 1,
'f': 1,
'g': 1
};
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) {
for (var key in obj) {
console.log(key);
}
}
var keys = Object.keys(obj)
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) {
for(let i = 0; i < keys.length; i++) {
console.log(keys[i]);
}
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for-in | |
Object.keys |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for-in | 2.3 Ops/sec |
Object.keys | 2.3 Ops/sec |
Measuring the performance of two different approaches to iterate over an object's keys in JavaScript can be a fascinating benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a microbenchmark that compares the performance of two methods:
for-in
loopObject.keys()
methodBoth methods are used to log each key-value pair of an object (obj
) containing 10000 properties.
Options compared:
Two options are being compared in this benchmark:
for-in
loop.for-in
loop iterates over the object's own enumerable properties, and the variable key
takes on the value of each property in turn.Object.keys()
method to get an array of an object's own enumerable property names.Object.keys()
returns an array of strings representing the property names of the given object. The loop then iterates over this array using a for
loop.Pros and Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
for-in
Cons:
Object.keys()
methodLibrary:
In both cases, no library is explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that some libraries, like Lodash or Underscore.js, may provide optimized versions of these methods.
Special JavaScript feature/syntax:
There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two iteration approaches.
Other alternatives:
In addition to for-in
and Object.keys()
, there are other ways to iterate over an object's properties, such as:
forEach()
loop with a callback functionArray.prototype.forEach()
method (which can be used on an array of property names)for...of
loops or map()
However, these alternatives are not being tested in this specific benchmark.
Overall, this microbenchmark provides valuable insight into the performance differences between two common iteration methods in JavaScript.