var str = 'Pedro de Alcântara Francisco Antônio João Carlos Xavier de Paula Miguel Rafael Joaquim José Gonzaga Pascoal Cipriano Serafim de Bragança e Bourbon';
str.match(/^.+(\s)/)
str.split(' ')[0]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Regex | |
Split |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Regex | 5943753.5 Ops/sec |
Split | 7402259.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches:
/^.+(\\s)/
) to extract the first part of a string.split()
method with a space character (' '
) as the separator to split a string into an array.Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code defines a string variable str
containing a full name: "Pedro de Alcântara Francisco Antônio João Carlos Xavier de Paula Miguel Rafael Joaquim José Gonzaga Pascoal Cipriano Serafim de Bragança e Bourbon".
Library/Functions Used
None.
Special JS Features/Syntax
Neither of the test cases uses any special JavaScript features or syntax. The regular expression is a standard regex pattern, and the split()
method is a built-in JavaScript method.
Comparison and Pros/Cons
The two approaches are compared in terms of execution speed:
match()
method.split(' ')
) to split the input string into an array.Benchmark Result
The latest benchmark result shows that the split()
approach is slightly faster (more executions per second) on this specific test case, running at 7402259.0 executions per second compared to 5943753.5 executions per second for the regex approach.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches could be considered:
split()
or regex, a custom function can be written to parse the input string based on a specific format.However, it's essential to note that these alternatives might not always outperform split()
or regex, especially when considering the overhead of using additional libraries or writing custom code.