Benchmark: get by id - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.1.0.min.js"></script>
<div id="testElement"></div>

Script Preparation code:

function getElement(a,b,c){var d;return void 0==b&&(d=document.getElementById(a)||document.querySelector(a)),null==d&&(0==b?(d=document.getElementsByClassName(a),0==d.length&&(d=document.getElementsByTagName(a)),0==d.length&&(d=document.querySelectorAll(a)),0==d.length&&(d=getElementsByClassName(a))):(c=null==c?0:c,d=document.getElementsByClassName(a)[c]||document.getElementsByTagName(a)[c]||document.querySelectorAll(a)[c]||getElementsByClassName(a)[c])),d}

Tests:

vanilla
var el = getElementByID("testElement"); var className = el.className;
jquery
var el = $("#testElement")[0]; var className = el.className;
custom function
var el = getElement("testElement"); var className = el.className;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
vanilla
jquery
custom function

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark measures the performance of different approaches to retrieve an element's class name in JavaScript. Specifically, it compares three methods:

1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: Using native DOM methods (`getElementById`, `getElementsByClassName`) without any libraries.
2. **jQuery**: Utilizing the jQuery library to select elements and access their properties.
3. **Custom function**: A custom implementation of the `getElement` function.

**Options compared:**

* Vanilla JavaScript (native DOM methods)
* jQuery
* Custom function

**Pros and cons of each approach:**

1. **Vanilla JavaScript**:
	* Pros: No external dependencies, efficient for small-scale applications.
	* Cons: Can be slower than other approaches due to the overhead of native DOM method calls.
2. **jQuery**:
	* Pros: Fast and efficient, widely used, and well-maintained library.
	* Cons: External dependency, larger bundle size, and potential performance impact if not optimized correctly.
3. **Custom function**:
	* Pros: Can be optimized for specific use cases, potentially faster than native DOM methods or jQuery.
	* Cons: Requires manual implementation and maintenance, may have a higher learning curve.

**Library usage:**

The benchmark uses the jQuery library to provide the `$` alias for accessing elements and their properties. The custom function also leverages jQuery under the hood.

**Special JavaScript features/syntax:**

None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript engines have implemented various features like WebAssembly, async/await, and arrow functions, which might not be directly relevant to this specific benchmark.

**Other alternatives:**

* **Document Query Language (DQL)**: A query language for the Document Object Model (DOM), which could potentially offer a more efficient alternative to native DOM methods.
* **Polyfills**: Implementing polyfills for older browsers or environments that don't support modern JavaScript features, like arrow functions or async/await.
* **Other JavaScript libraries**: Other libraries, such as React or Angular, might also be used to achieve similar functionality and performance characteristics.

Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case, project requirements, and personal preference.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/53.0.2785.101 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 53 on Mac OS X 10.11.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
vanilla	0.0 Ops/sec
jquery	510573.6 Ops/sec
custom function	1524631.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

get by id (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: vanilla vs jquery vs custom function

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

vanilla

jquery

custom function

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 25 days ago):