function runLoop(fn) {
for (let i = 1000; i--; ) {
fn("bacon", "egg", "spam");
}
}
function makeArray() {
return Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
}
runLoop(makeArray);
function makeArray() {
var _args;
return (_args = []).push.apply(_args, arguments), _args;
}
runLoop(makeArray);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
baseline (main) | |
current (PR) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
baseline (main) | 1704.7 Ops/sec |
current (PR) | 1785.9 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the explanation for you.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test on MeasurThat.net, which compares two different approaches to convert arguments to an array in JavaScript.
In this specific benchmark, we have:
[] .slice.call(arguments)
: This approach uses the slice()
method of the Array prototype, which returns a shallow copy of a portion of the original array. The arguments are passed as an array, and slice()
is used to extract them.[] .push.apply(arguments)
: This approach uses the push()
method of the Array prototype and applies it to all elements in the array using apply()
. The result is an array with the same elements.Options Comparison
The two approaches have different performance characteristics:
slice.call(arguments)
: This method has a relatively low overhead, as it only requires a single function call and returns a new array. However, it can be slower for large input arrays due to the creation of a new array object..push.apply(arguments)
: This approach is generally faster than slice.call()
because it uses a more optimized implementation of the push()
method, which only requires a single iteration over the arguments.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary:
slice.call(arguments)
:.push.apply(arguments)
:push()
method.Other Considerations
In modern JavaScript, both approaches are relatively fast and efficient. However, if you're working with large input arrays, the performance difference between these two methods might be noticeable. Additionally, some libraries or frameworks might optimize one approach over the other, so it's essential to consider the specific use case and requirements.
Library Usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, if you're familiar with popular JavaScript libraries, you might recognize Array.prototype.slice.call()
as a polyfill for older browsers or environments where slice()
is not supported natively.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The test doesn't use any special features or syntax that would require additional explanation. The focus is on comparing two standard Array methods.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its results better!