var precomp = new RegExp(/[^A-Za-z0-9.-]+|(?=[-A-Za-z])|(?<=[A-Za-z])|(?<=\.\d+)(?=\.)/g);
var test = "M 0 0 L 10 10 L10 10 L20 20 M 0 0 L 10 10 L10 10 L20 20 M 0 0 L 10 10 L10 10 L20 20 M 0 0 L 10 10 L10 10 L20 20";
test.split(precomp);
test.split(/[^A-Za-z0-9.-]+|(?=[-A-Za-z])|(?<=[A-Za-z])|(?<=\.\d+)(?=\.)/g);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
precomp | |
literal |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
precomp | 20032.2 Ops/sec |
literal | 20092.2 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
MeasureThat.net provides a platform for testing JavaScript microbenchmarks, where users can create and run their own benchmarks or use pre-existing ones. The current benchmark is defined in two parts:
precomp
) that will be used to test the performance of various approaches.split()
method.Test Cases
Let's analyze each test case:
This test uses the new RegExp()
constructor to create a regular expression (precomp
) and then passes it to the split()
method.
var precomp = new RegExp(/[^A-Za-z0-9.-]+|(?=[-A-Za-z])|(?<=[A-Za-z])|(?<=\\.\\d+)(?=\\.)/g);
The regular expression precomp
matches one or more of the following patterns:
[^A-Za-z0-9.-]
)[-A-Za-z]
)(?<=[A-Za-z])
)(?<=\\.\\d+)(?=\\.)
)Pros and Cons
Using new RegExp()
can be beneficial when you need to create a complex regular expression, but it comes with some drawbacks:
Test Case 2: "literal"
This test uses a literal regular expression (/[^A-Za-z0-9.-]+|[-A-Za-z]|[\w]|\.\d+\.
) directly in the split()
method.
test.split(/[^A-Za-z0-9.-]+|[-A-Za-z]|[\w]|\.\d+\.\/g);
The regular expression matches one or more of the following patterns:
[^A-Za-z0-9.-]
)[-A-Za-z]
)\w
)\.\d+\.
)Pros and Cons
Using a literal regular expression can be beneficial when you need to create a simple, well-defined pattern, but it may not offer the same level of flexibility as new RegExp()
.
Library: String.prototype.split()
The split()
method is a built-in JavaScript method that splits a string into an array of substrings based on a regular expression. The library used here is the native JavaScript library.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark.
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for splitting strings, consider using:
Array.prototype.reduce()
: Instead of using split()
and concatenating arrays, you can use reduce()
to build the output array.String.prototype.replaceAll()
: This method replaces all occurrences of a pattern with another value, which can be useful for string manipulation tasks.Keep in mind that these alternatives may offer different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the split()
method.