Benchmark: Lodash pick vs native pick vs compiled fn pick

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src=''>

</script>

Script Preparation code:

function pick1(obj, keys) {

  var res = {};
  if (typeof keys === 'string') {
    if (keys in obj) {
      res[keys] = obj[keys];
    }
    return res;
  }

  var len = keys.length;
  var idx = -1;

  while (++idx < len) {
    var key = keys[idx];
    if (key in obj) {
      res[key] = obj[key];
    }
  }
  return res;
};

var pick2 = new Function('el', 'if (!el) return {}; const res = {}; ' + 
                         'if ("a" in el) res.a = el.a;' + 
                         'if ("d" in el) res.d = el.d;' + 
                         'if ("i" in el) res.i = el.i;' + 
                         ' return res;')


function getRandomInt(min, max) {
  min = Math.ceil(min);
  max = Math.floor(max);
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min) + min); //The maximum is exclusive and the minimum is inclusive
}


var data = [];

for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
    const obj = {};
	const propsCount = getRandomInt(0, 10);
  
  	for (let j = 0; j < propsCount; j++) {
		
	 	const propCode = getRandomInt(97, 122);
      
  		obj[String.fromCharCode(propCode)] = propCode;
	}
  
    data.push(obj);
}

Tests:

Lodash
data.map((obj) => _.pick(obj, ['a','d','i']))
native pick
data.map((obj) => pick1(obj, ['a','d','i']))
compiled function
data.map((obj) => pick2(obj, ['a','d','i']))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
native pick
compiled function

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	106.9 Ops/sec
native pick	802.7 Ops/sec
compiled function	665.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation of what's being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Purpose**

The benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches to pick (extract) specific properties from an object:

1. **Lodash**: Uses the popular JavaScript library Lodash, which provides a utility function `pick` that can extract specific properties from an object.
2. **Native Pick**: Implements the `pick` functionality in pure JavaScript, without using any external libraries.
3. **Compiled Function**: Compiles a JavaScript function that performs the same task as the native pick implementation.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches:

* Lodash: Uses the `pick` function from Lodash to extract properties.
* Native Pick: Implements the `pick` functionality in pure JavaScript, without using any external libraries.
* Compiled Function: Compiles a JavaScript function that performs the same task as the native pick implementation.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

* **Lodash**: Pros:
	+ Fast and efficient
	+ Provides a well-maintained and widely-used library
	+ Easy to use and integrate
* Cons:
	+ Requires an external library, which can add overhead
* **Native Pick**: Pros:
	+ No additional libraries or dependencies required
	+ Optimized for performance in pure JavaScript
	+ Customizable and extensible
* Cons:
	+ May require more code and effort to implement correctly
* **Compiled Function**: Pros:
	+ Can be optimized for performance using Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation
	+ Allows for more control over the generated code
	+ Can be used in situations where native pick is not available or suitable
* Cons:
	+ May require more expertise and effort to implement correctly
	+ Can be slower than native pick due to JIT compilation overhead

**Library Used**

The benchmark uses Lodash version 4.17.5, which provides a robust and widely-used implementation of the `pick` function.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of three different approaches to extract properties from an object.

**Alternative Approaches**

Other alternatives for extracting properties from an object include:

* Using a library like Moment.js for date and time parsing
* Using a library like jQuery for DOM manipulation
* Using a library like React or Angular for building UI components

In terms of pure JavaScript implementations, other approaches might involve using `Object.keys()`, `Array.prototype.forEach()`, or `Array.prototype.reduce()` to iterate over the properties and extract the desired ones.

Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of three different approaches to extracting properties from an object, highlighting the trade-offs between using external libraries, native JavaScript implementations, and compiled functions.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash pick vs native pick vs compiled fn pick (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs native pick vs compiled function

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

native pick

compiled function

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):