Benchmark: find vs iterate - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

     
   var arr = [];
    for (var i = 0; i <= 10000; i++) {
      arr.push({label: i});
    }

Tests:

find
arr.find(x => x.label === 250);
iterate
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++) { if (arr[i].label==250) return arr[i]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
find
iterate

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**: The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: using the `find()` method and using a traditional `for` loop with an `if` statement to find the first element in an array that matches a certain condition.

**Script Preparation Code**: This code creates an array `arr` with 10,000 elements, each containing a `label` property. The array is populated using a `for` loop that increments a variable `i` from 0 to 10,000.

The purpose of this script preparation code is to create a large dataset for the benchmark test cases to operate on.

**Html Preparation Code**: This field is empty in the provided JSON data, which suggests that no HTML-related code or setup is required for these specific benchmark tests.

**Test Cases**: There are two individual test cases:

1. **find**: This test case uses the `find()` method with a callback function to find the first element in the `arr` array whose `label` property matches 250.
2. **iterate**: This test case uses a traditional `for` loop with an `if` statement to iterate through the `arr` array and return the first element whose `label` property matches 250.

**Library/Functionality Used**: In both test cases, the `find()` method is used in the second test case. The `find()` method is a part of the Array prototype in JavaScript and is used to find the first element in an array that satisfies a provided condition. It returns the first element that meets the specified condition, or `-1` if no elements are found.

The other alternatives for finding the first matching element in an array are:

* Using `indexOf()` method, which returns the index of the first occurrence of the specified value, or -1 if it's not found.
* Using a traditional `for` loop and checking each element individually.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Find() Method**: Pros:
	+ More concise and readable code
	+ Efficient use of resources (only checks one element at a time)
Cons:
	+ May be slower for very large arrays due to the overhead of creating a callback function
* **Traditional `for` Loop**: Pros:
	+ Can be faster for very large arrays because it avoids the overhead of creating a callback function
Cons:
	+ Less concise and readable code
	+ More resource-intensive (checks every element in the array)

In general, the choice between using `find()` or a traditional `for` loop depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. If conciseness and readability are more important than raw speed, `find()` might be a better choice. However, if speed is critical, a traditional `for` loop might be a better option.

The test results from MeasureThat.net will provide insights into which approach is faster for this specific benchmark case.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_5) AppleWebKit/603.2.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/10.1.1 Safari/603.2.4

Browser/OS: Safari 10 on Mac OS X 10.12.5

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
find	377623.2 Ops/sec
iterate	43868.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

find vs iterate (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: find vs iterate

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

find

iterate

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):