var range = (from, to) => {
const output = []
for(var x = from; x < to; x++){
output.push(x)
}
return output
}
range(0, 10).reduce((acc, num) => {
return {
acc,
[num]: num
}
}, {})
range(0, 10).reduce((acc, num) => {
acc[num] = num
return acc
}, {})
range(0, 10).reduce((acc, num) => {
return Object.assign(acc, {[num]: num})
}, {})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
with spread operator | |
with mutation | |
with object assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
with spread operator | 1662795.9 Ops/sec |
with mutation | 6214920.0 Ops/sec |
with object assign | 355567.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance of three approaches to add an element to an object in a reduce function: using the spread operator ({...acc, [num]: num}
), mutation (acc[num] = num
), and Object.assign
.
Options Compared
{...obj, key: value}
) to add a new property to an object.acc[num] = num
).Object.assign()
method to merge two objects and update the existing one.Pros and Cons
Library and Purpose
None explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that Object.assign()
is a built-in method in JavaScript and does not require any external libraries.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The benchmark uses the spread operator ({...obj, key: value}
) and arrow functions ((acc, num) => { ... }
). These features are part of modern JavaScript syntax and are widely supported across most browsers.
Alternatives
Other approaches to add an element to an object in a reduce function could include:
Array.prototype.push()
or Array.prototype.splice()
: While not directly applicable to a reduce function, these methods can be used to append elements to an array, which can then be passed to the reduce function.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide the same level of performance or conciseness as the spread operator, mutation, or Object.assign()
methods.