var points = [];
points.push([0, 0]);
points.push({"x": 0, "y": 0});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arrays | |
objects |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arrays | 2725293.2 Ops/sec |
objects | 362682.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its options, as well as the pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Overview
The given benchmark tests two different approaches to push elements onto an array or object in JavaScript: arrays (points.push([0, 0])
) and objects (points.push({\"x\": 0, \"y\": 0})
). The goal is to measure which approach performs better.
Options Compared
There are only two options being compared:
push()
method with an array literal ([0, 0]
).push()
method with an object literal ({\"x\": 0, \"y\": 0}
).Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Arrays:
Pros:
Cons:
Objects:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, no specific library is used. However, the points
variable is likely an array or object initialized with some default values (in the "Script Preparation Code" section).
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
If you were to modify this benchmark to include more options, here are a few possibilities:
Set
or Map
, instead of arrays and objects.unshift()
or splice()
.Keep in mind that the results of such modifications would depend on the specific use case and requirements.