Benchmark: eval vs new Function vs function vs creation

Script Preparation code:

var func = new Function("return 2 * 3");
var regular = function(){
return 2 * 3;
};
var creation = function () {
  var func = new Function("return 2 * 3");
  return func();
};

Tests:

eval
eval("2 * 3");
new Function
func();
function
regular();
creation
creation();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
eval
new Function
function
creation

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test suite that compares the performance of four different ways to define and execute a simple expression: `eval()`, `new Function()`, `function` keyword, and "creation" (a custom implementation).

Each benchmark definition in the test cases uses one of these methods to evaluate or execute the expression `2 * 3`. The goal is to measure which method performs best in terms of execution speed.

**Options compared**

The four options being tested are:

1. **eval()**: A built-in JavaScript function that evaluates a string as JavaScript code.
2. **new Function()**: Creates a new function with the given string as its body, and then executes it.
3. **function keyword**: Uses the `function` keyword to define an anonymous function, which is then executed.
4. **creation**: A custom implementation that defines a function using `new Function()` and then immediately calls it.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. **eval()**:
	* Pros: Simple to use, no need to declare a variable for the function.
	* Cons: Can be slower than other approaches due to its dynamic nature, potential security risks if used with untrusted input.
2. **new Function()**:
	* Pros: More efficient than `eval()` and provides better control over function execution, but still has some overhead.
	* Cons: Requires declaring a variable for the function before using it.
3. **function keyword**:
	* Pros: Fastest way to define an anonymous function, no need to declare a variable beforehand.
	* Cons: Can be less efficient than `new Function()` if used with complex expressions or multiple function calls.
4. **creation**:
	* Pros: Provides better control over function execution and avoids some overhead of `new Function()`, but still has more complexity than other approaches.
	* Cons: Requires declaring a variable for the function before using it, which can be less convenient.

**Other considerations**

The benchmark's results are influenced by factors such as:

* JavaScript engine optimizations
* Browser-specific features or extensions (e.g., Chrome's performance optimization techniques)
* Platform-specific differences in execution speed

**Library usage**

There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the provided JSON. However, `new Function()` creates a new function with a given string as its body, which implies the use of JavaScript's built-in `Function` constructor.

**Special JS features or syntax**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are used beyond what's required for the benchmark itself (e.g., `eval()`, function definition using the `function` keyword).

**Alternatives**

Alternative approaches to define and execute expressions include:

* Using arrow functions (`=>`) instead of traditional functions
* Utilizing modern JavaScript features like async/await or generator functions
* Employing libraries like Node.js's built-in `vm` (Virtual Machine) module for executing user-defined code

However, the benchmark seems to focus on evaluating the performance differences between these four specific approaches rather than exploring alternative methods.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.128 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 89 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
eval	1985095.9 Ops/sec
new Function	8328216.0 Ops/sec
function	8570403.0 Ops/sec
creation	836166.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

eval vs new Function vs function vs creation (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: eval vs new Function vs function vs creation

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

eval

new Function

function

creation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):