Benchmark: String vs Object find

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:


var arr = ['cat', 'dog', 'hippo'];
var arr2 = [{id: 'cat'}, {id: 'dog'}, {id: 'hippo'}];

Tests:

String Find
_.find(arr, 'cat');
Object Find
_.find(arr2, (a) => a.id === 'cat');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
String Find
Object Find

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark tests two different approaches for finding an element within an array: using a string and using an object.

**Test Case 1: String Find**

* **Benchmark Definition**: `_.find(arr, 'cat');`
* **Library used**: Lodash (a popular JavaScript utility library)
* **Purpose of the library**: The `_.find()` function is used to search through the array for an element that matches the given string (`'cat'`).
* **Description**: In this test case, we're using a simple string comparison to find the element `'cat'` within the array.
* **Pros and Cons**:
	+ Pros: Easy to read and understand, straightforward implementation
	+ Cons: May not be suitable for large datasets or complex searches

**Test Case 2: Object Find**

* **Benchmark Definition**: `_.find(arr2, (a) => a.id === 'cat');`
* **Library used**: Lodash (same library as above)
* **Purpose of the library**: Again, the `_.find()` function is used to search through the array for an element that matches the given condition.
* **Description**: In this test case, we're using a callback function to find the element with the property `id` equal to `'cat'`. The `(a) => a.id === 'cat'` expression is an arrow function that takes each element (`a`) in the array and checks if its `id` property is equal to `'cat'`.
* **Pros and Cons**:
	+ Pros: More flexible and suitable for large datasets or complex searches
	+ Cons: May be less readable due to the callback function

**Other alternatives?**

Yes, there are other ways to find an element within an array in JavaScript. Some examples include:

1. Using a `for` loop: This is a simple and straightforward approach, but may not be suitable for large datasets.
2. Using `Array.prototype.findIndex()` (ES2015+): This method returns the index of the first element that satisfies the provided testing function. It's more efficient than using a `for` loop or a callback function with `_.find()`.
3. Using `Array.prototype.some()` (ES2015+): This method tests whether at least one element in the array satisfies the provided testing function.

**Additional considerations**

When choosing between these approaches, consider factors such as:

* Dataset size: For small datasets, simple string comparisons or `for` loops may be sufficient.
* Complexity of search: If you're searching for an element based on multiple conditions or a complex criteria, using a callback function or `Array.prototype.findIndex()`/`.some()` might be more suitable.
* Readability and maintainability: Choose the approach that's most readable and maintainable for your specific use case.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/90.0.4430.72 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 90 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
String Find	3235882.0 Ops/sec
Object Find	3670125.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

String vs Object find (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: String Find vs Object Find

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

String Find

Object Find

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated one month ago):