Benchmark: RegEx vs For Loop ..... no shit... 123

HTML Preparation code:

var string = ")odasgsdfsdfpassw";

Script Preparation code:

var string = ")odasgsdfsdfpassw";

Tests:

RegEx
let isPasswordValid = false; const number = new RegExp('(?=.*[0-9])'); isPasswordValid = number.test(string);
For Loop
let isPasswordValid = false; for (let i = 0; i < string.length; i++) { let code = string.charCodeAt(i); if (code >= 48 && code <= 57) { isPasswordValid = true; break; } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
RegEx
For Loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Overview**

The test is comparing two approaches to check if a given string contains at least one digit (0-9): using a regular expression (RegEx) versus a for loop.

**What's Being Tested?**

1. **RegEx**: The benchmark uses the `RegExp` object with a regular expression pattern `(?=.*[0-9])`. This pattern checks if there is any sequence of characters (`.*`) that contains at least one digit (`[0-9]`). The `test()` method returns `true` if the string matches this pattern, and `false` otherwise.
2. **For Loop**: The benchmark uses a simple for loop to iterate over each character in the string and checks if its ASCII code is between 48 (the code point for '0') and 57 (the code point for '9'). If it finds such a digit, it sets `isPasswordValid` to `true` and breaks out of the loop.

**Options Compared**

* **RegEx**: Pros:
	+ Convenient and concise way to match patterns.
	+ Can be more efficient than manual character-by-character checks for large strings.
* Cons:
	+ May have performance issues with complex patterns or very long input strings.
	+ Some browsers may not optimize RegEx well, leading to slower execution times.
* **For Loop**: Pros:
	+ Provides direct control over the iteration process.
	+ Can be more efficient for small to medium-sized input strings.
* Cons:
	+ More verbose and error-prone compared to RegEx.
	+ May require more computational resources due to character-by-character checks.

**Library Used**

None, as this is a basic example of a regular expression and a for loop implementation in JavaScript.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

None mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that the `RegExp` object has many features beyond simple pattern matching, such as anchoring (`^` or `$`) and flag options (e.g., `g`, `m`, or `i`).

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to explore alternative approaches:

* **Using a library like Lodash**: You could use the `lodash.isNumber()` function, which checks if a value is a number.
* **Using a streaming approach**: Instead of checking each character individually, you could use a streaming algorithm that processes the input string in chunks or using a streaming library.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide significant performance improvements over the basic for loop implementation and RegEx used in this benchmark.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 16_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 16 on iOS 16.0

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx	1193974.9 Ops/sec
For Loop	349498.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

RegEx vs For Loop ..... no shit... 123 (version: 0)

-

Comparing performance of: RegEx vs For Loop

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

RegEx

For Loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):