return [Array(1000).keys()];
var range = new Array(1000);
for(var i = 0; i < range.length; i++) range[i] = i;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Spread | |
Loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Spread | 33046.5 Ops/sec |
Loop | 98801.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases for measuring JavaScript performance:
[...Array(1000).keys()]
).Options compared
The two test cases compare two different approaches:
for
loop to create the array.Pros and Cons
for
loop.Other considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the trade-off between conciseness, readability, and performance. If code readability is crucial, the spread syntax might be a better choice. However, if compatibility with older browsers is essential, the manual loop approach might be necessary.
Libraries used (if any)
None of the provided test cases use libraries explicitly. The benchmark uses built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS feature or syntax
The ...
operator in the spread syntax is a new operator introduced in ES6 that allows for more concise array creation. This feature was not available in older versions of JavaScript.
Other alternatives
If you'd like to test other approaches, here are some additional ideas:
map()
method.from()
method.Feel free to ask if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these alternatives!