var arr = [];
var count = 25000;
for(var i = 0; i<count; i++)
{
arr.push(i);
}
var arrLen = arr.length;
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < arrLen; i++){
sum = arr[i];
}
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
sum = arr[i];
}
var arrLen = arr.length;
var sum = 0;
for (var i = arrLen; i !== 0; i--){
sum = arr[i];
}
var arrLen = arr.length;
var sum = 0;
var base = 0;
for (; base !== arrLen; base++){
sum = arr[base];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Cache length | |
Do not cache | |
Reverse | |
Reverse Opt |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Cache length | 22095.3 Ops/sec |
Do not cache | 22463.9 Ops/sec |
Reverse | 18907.2 Ops/sec |
Reverse Opt | 18871.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of different approaches to accessing an array's length property versus performing calculations within a loop.
Options Compared
There are four test cases:
arrLen
before the loop, and then used as the loop condition.length
property is accessed within the loop on each iteration.arr.length - 1
, arr.length - 2
, ...), rather than from start to finish.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
length
is accessed within the loop, which can improve performance.length
on each iteration. This approach has higher overhead due to repeated accesses to length
.length
is needed.length
repeatedly, while still caching the result once.Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark JSON. However, some JavaScript features may be used implicitly, such as:
for
) are used throughout the benchmarks.arr
, i
, sum
) are declared and reused.Other Considerations
The benchmark measures the performance of different approaches to accessing an array's length property. The results will show which approach is faster for this specific use case.
Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative methods or variations, consider:
Array.prototype.forEach()
: Instead of using traditional loops, consider using the forEach()
method, which can provide better performance and readability.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case and requirements. The benchmark JSON provides a good starting point for exploring different optimization strategies.