const offArrays = obj => Object.keys(obj).reduce((off, key) => (obj[key] instanceof Array) ? off : (obj[key] instanceof Object) ? { off, [key]: offArrays(obj[key]) } : { off, [key]: obj[key] }, {})
let objeto = {
a: 1,
b: [2,3],
c: 4,
d: {
e: 5,
f: {
g: 6,
h: [7, 8]
},
i: [9, 10],
j: 11
},
k: {
l: [12,13]
},
m: 14
}
console.log(offArrays(objeto))
const withoutArrays = obj => {
if (!(obj instanceof Object)) return obj
if (!(obj instanceof Array)) {
let result
for (const prop in obj) {
const out = withoutArrays(obj[prop])
if (out !== undefined) result = { result, [prop]: out }
}
return result
}
return undefined
}
let objeto = {
a: 1,
b: [2,3],
c: 4,
d: {
e: 5,
f: {
g: 6,
h: [7, 8]
},
i: [9, 10],
j: 11
},
k: {
l: [12,13]
},
m: 14
}
console.log(withoutArrays(objeto))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
off Arrays with Reducer | |
off arrays with Linear |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
off Arrays with Reducer | 13170.7 Ops/sec |
off arrays with Linear | 13419.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested, compared, and other considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition represents a JavaScript function that tests two approaches to handling arrays in objects:
offArrays
: This function uses the Object.keys()
method to iterate over the object's properties. For each property:obj[key] instanceof Array
), it recursively calls itself on that array.obj[key] instanceof Object
), it creates a new object with the existing key and values, but only for the objects (not arrays).withoutArrays
: This function checks if the object is not an instance of Object
or Array
. If it's an object, it iterates over its properties and recursively calls itself on each property value that is an object.Comparison
The comparison between these two approaches can be summarized as follows:
offArrays
approach creates a new object with the result, which may lead to increased memory usage. In contrast, withoutArrays
creates a shallow copy of the original object, which might be more efficient in terms of memory usage.offArrays
uses recursion, which can lead to stack overflow errors for deeply nested objects. However, it also avoids creating unnecessary intermediate arrays.withoutArrays
uses iteration and shallow copying, which can be faster but may create more memory allocations.Pros and Cons
Library or Special JS feature
Neither offArrays
nor withoutArrays
uses any external libraries. However, both functions rely on built-in JavaScript methods like Object.keys()
, instanceof
, and iteration (for...in
loop).
Special JS features
There are no special JavaScript features used in these benchmark definitions.
Other alternatives
Some alternative approaches to handling arrays in objects could include:
Array.isArray()
method instead of instanceof Array
.for...of
loops or Symbol.iterator
.mapObject
function) or other array manipulation utilities.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce new trade-offs and complexities, so it's essential to carefully evaluate their performance and memory usage characteristics before making a choice.