Benchmark Run Result for: es6 destructuring vs lodash _.get string and array keys with toPath and manual caching

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.get string and array keys with toPath and manual caching

compare performance of _.get to es6 desu

Date tested: one year ago

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0

Test name	Executions per second
destructuring with defaults, empty input	292717200.0 Ops/sec
lodash get, empty input	7513061.0 Ops/sec
destructuring with defaults, find item	97254640.0 Ops/sec
lodash get, find item	6776687.0 Ops/sec
destructuring dynamic key	96330300.0 Ops/sec
lodash dynamic key	6656370.0 Ops/sec
lodash dynamic key using array	19046560.0 Ops/sec
lodash dynamic key using manually cached array	17335110.0 Ops/sec

Benchmark definition (click to collapse):

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function destructuringFn(input) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function destructuringFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { [key]: documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function lodashFn(input) {
  const documents = _.get(input, 'contextMenu.data.documents', []);
  return documents;
}

function lodashFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const documents = _.get(input, `contextMenu.data.${key}`, []);
  return documents;
}

function lodashFnDynamicArray(input, key) {
  const documents = _.get(input, ['contextMenu', 'data', 'key'], []);
  return documents;
}

let paths = {};
function lodashFnDynamicCachedArray(input, key) {
  paths[key] = paths[key] || _.toPath(`contextMenu.data.${key}`);
  const documents = _.get(input, paths[key], []);
  return documents;
}

function test(fn, input, key) {
  fn(input, key);
}

Tests:

destructuring with defaults, empty input
test(destructuringFn, {});
lodash get, empty input
test(lodashFn, {});
destructuring with defaults, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input);
lodash get, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFn, input);
destructuring dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input, 'documents');
lodash dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFnDynamic, input, 'documents');
lodash dynamic key using array
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFnDynamicArray, input, 'documents');
lodash dynamic key using manually cached array
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFnDynamicCachedArray, input, 'documents');

Open this result on MeasureThat.net

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.get string and array keys with toPath and manual caching

compare performance of _.get to es6 desu

Date tested: one year ago

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0

Benchmark definition (click to collapse):

destructuring with defaults, empty input

lodash get, empty input

destructuring with defaults, find item

lodash get, find item

destructuring dynamic key

lodash dynamic key

lodash dynamic key using array

lodash dynamic key using manually cached array