Run results for: Template strings vs. String.concat v2

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/79.0.3945.79 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 79

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.14.6

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 5 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
Template string	15565051.0 Ops/sec
String.concat	7136666.0 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

const base = '1-2'
const separator = '-';
const suffix = 3;

function templateString() {
  return `${base}${separator}${suffix}`;
}

function stringConcat() {
  return base.concat(separator, suffix);
}

​x
 
const base = '1-2'const separator = '-';const suffix = 3;​function templateString() {  return `${base}${separator}${suffix}`;}​function stringConcat() {  return base.concat(separator, suffix);}

Tests:

Template string
templateString()
templateString()
String.concat
stringConcat()
stringConcat()