Run results for: native find vs lodash _.find but for 100k elements

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/76.0.3809.132 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 76

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 4 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
array find	13865180.0 Ops/sec
_.find	4049744.0 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(min, max) {
  min = Math.ceil(min);
  max = Math.floor(max);
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min)) + min; //Максимум не включается, минимум включается
}

var users = Array.from({ length: 100000 }, item => ({
  age: getRandomInt(18, 65),
  user: ['joey', 'ross', 'chandler'][getRandomInt(0, 2)]
}))

Tests:

array find
// Native users.find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
_.find
_.find(users, function (o) { return o.age < 40; })

Run results for: native find vs lodash _.find but for 100k elements

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method

array find

_.find