Run results for: index vs lastindexof empty

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/76.0.3809.132 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 76

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 4 years ago

Test name	Executions per second
lastIndexOf	3452169.0 Ops/sec
indexOf	863275600.0 Ops/sec

Tests:

lastIndexOf
var str = "According to that, indexOf is just a little bit faster. Of course, it does depend on what you are indexing.IndexOf looks for the first occurrence and lastIndexOf returns to the last occurrence. That all said, their are much better functions around now like map.To be honest though, if Google is using it there is probably a good reason."; var n = str.lastIndexOf("havent string");
indexOf
var str = "According to that, indexOf is just a little bit faster. Of course, it does depend on what you are indexing.IndexOf looks for the first occurrence and lastIndexOf returns to the last occurrence. That all said, their are much better functions around now like map.To be honest though, if Google is using it there is probably a good reason."; var n = str.indexOf("havent string");