Run results for: cloneNode(true) vs innerHMTL

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/134.0.0.0

Browser: Chrome 134

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 11 days ago

Test name	Executions per second
cloneNode(true)	131.6 Ops/sec
innerHTML	99.1 Ops/sec

Script Preparation code:

var str = `<div>${Math.random().toString().slice(2)}</div>`;
var temp = document.createElement('template')
var res = '';
for(i=0; i<30000; i++){
	res += str
}
temp.innerHTML = res;

var div = document.createElement('div')

​x
 
var str = `<div>${Math.random().toString().slice(2)}</div>`;var temp = document.createElement('template')var res = '';for(i=0; i<30000; i++){    res += str}temp.innerHTML = res;​var div = document.createElement('div')

Tests:

cloneNode(true)
div.append(temp.content.cloneNode(true));
div.append(temp.content.cloneNode(true));
innerHTML
div.innerHTML = res;
div.innerHTML = res;