MeasureThat.net

Run results for: RegEx.test (with inline regex) vs. String.includes vs. String.match

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 131
Windows
Desktop
2 months ago
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 45086504.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 163684736.0 Ops/sec
String.match 8903239.0 Ops/sec
Script Preparation code:
AخA
 
var string = "Hello world!";
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

     
    /Hello/.test(string);

  • String.includes

     
    string.includes("Hello");

  • String.match

     
    string.match("Hello");