Run results for: variadics vs arrays

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 131

Operating system: Windows

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 16 days ago

Test name	Executions per second
variadic	10713618.0 Ops/sec
array	11909563.0 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

variadic
function test(...args) { let finalRep = ''; for(const item of args) { finalRep = item.toString(); } return finalRep; } const frep = test('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y','z');
array
function test(args) { let finalRep = ''; for(const item of args) { finalRep = item.toString(); } return finalRep; } const frep = test(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y','z']);

Run results for: variadics vs arrays

testing wheter variadic params in functions are faster or slower than simply passing arrays as arguments

variadic

array