Run results for: indexOf vs. Includes vs. Find vs. Some vs. Filter vs. loop vs. $.inArray()

Array.indexOf() vs. Array.includes(value) vs. Array.includes(function) vs. Array.find() vs. Array.some() vs. Array.filter() vs. Loop vs. JQuery's $.inArray() vs. lodash's _.includes()

Go to the benchmark

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0

Browser: Firefox 128

Operating system: Linux

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 3 months ago

Test name	Executions per second
Array.indexOf()	27580094.0 Ops/sec
Array.includes(value)	26852808.0 Ops/sec
Array.includes(function)	38394996.0 Ops/sec
Array.find()	27231474.0 Ops/sec
Array.some()	24395804.0 Ops/sec
Array.filter()	9333230.0 Ops/sec
Loop	29250916.0 Ops/sec
$.inArray()	17287254.0 Ops/sec
_.includes()	9832235.0 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var a = ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19"];

Tests:

Array.indexOf()
a.indexOf("12") >= 0
Array.includes(value)
a.includes("12")
Array.includes(function)
a.includes((v) => v === "12")
Array.find()
a.find((v) => v === "12")
Array.some()
a.some((v) => v === "12")
Array.filter()
a.filter((v) => v === "12").length > 0
Loop
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) { if (a[i] === "12") { return true; } } return false;
$.inArray()
$.inArray("12", a)
_.includes()
_.includes(a, "12")