MeasureThat.net

Run results for: gzip compatible compression libraries comparison - pako vs fflate

comparing gzip compatible compression and decompression of pako with fflate

Go to the benchmark
Run details:
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.5 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1
Mobile Safari 17
iOS 17.5.1
Mobile
10 months ago
Test name Executions per second
zip pako a 106.0 Ops/sec
zip fflate a 54.2 Ops/sec
zip pako b 16618.2 Ops/sec
zip fflate b 50275.3 Ops/sec
unzip pako a 242.3 Ops/sec
unzip fflate a 94.3 Ops/sec
unzip pako b 48109.3 Ops/sec
unzip fflate b 488798.5 Ops/sec
HTML Preparation code:
AخA
 
1
<script src="https://unpkg.com/fflate"></script>
2
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pako/2.1.0/pako.es5.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
 
const enc = new TextEncoder();
var a = new Uint8Array([...Array(1000000).keys()]);
var b = enc.encode('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog')
var ca = pako.gzip(a)
var cb = pako.gzip(b)
Tests:

  • zip pako a

     
    pako.gzip(a)

  • zip fflate a

     
    fflate.gzipSync(a)

  • zip pako b

     
    pako.gzip(b)

  • zip fflate b

     
    fflate.gzipSync(b)

  • unzip pako a

     
    pako.ungzip(ca);

  • unzip fflate a

     
    fflate.gunzipSync(ca);

  • unzip pako b

     
    pako.ungzip(cb)

  • unzip fflate b

     
    fflate.gunzipSync(cb)