Run results for: Javascript Array sorting performance with sort() and reduce() small array

Run details:

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser: Chrome 126

Operating system: Mac OS X 10.15.7

Device Platform: Desktop

Date tested: 10 months ago

Test name	Executions per second
with reduce()	402372.2 Ops/sec
with sort()	450401.0 Ops/sec

HTML Preparation code:

<div id='min-data'></div>

AخA
 
<div id='min-data'></div>

Tests:

with reduce()

const div = document.getElementById('min-data');

const newArray = [];
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++){
	const num = Math.floor(Math.random() * 10);
	newArray.push(num);
} 
newArray.reduce((a, b) => (a < b ? a : b), []);
div.innerHTML = newArray[0].toString();

​x
 
const div = document.getElementById('min-data');​const newArray = [];for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++){    const num = Math.floor(Math.random() * 10);    newArray.push(num);} newArray.reduce((a, b) => (a < b ? a : b), []);div.innerHTML = newArray[0].toString();

with sort()

const div = document.getElementById('min-data');

const newArray = [];
for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++){
	const num = Math.floor(Math.random() * 10);
	newArray.push(num);
} 
newArray.sort((a, b) => a - b);
div.innerHTML = newArray[0].toString();

 
const div = document.getElementById('min-data');​const newArray = [];for(let i = 0; i < 10; i++){    const num = Math.floor(Math.random() * 10);    newArray.push(num);} newArray.sort((a, b) => a - b);div.innerHTML = newArray[0].toString();